AI Agent Reliability
The measurable degree to which an agent behaves as intended, stays within authority, and recovers safely.
Read the concept →Canonical concepts
A shared vocabulary for engineering autonomous systems whose behavior must remain measurable, bounded, observable, recoverable, and accountable.
The measurable degree to which an agent behaves as intended, stays within authority, and recovers safely.
Read the concept →The behavioral dimensions and engineering controls that determine whether an agent can be trusted in production.
Read the concept →The accumulated risk created when capability, complexity, or authority grows faster than reliability engineering.
Read the concept →Authority that expands with demonstrated reliability and contracts when reliability deteriorates.
Read the concept →The explicit, scoped set of actions an agent may take and the data those actions may touch.
Read the concept →The organizational structures, technical policies, and accountability mechanisms that govern agent behavior.
Read the concept →The concrete engineering mechanisms that implement and protect the Reliability Surface.
Read the concept →A five-level model for how systematically agent reliability engineering has been implemented.
Open the maturity model →New concepts are added through community review, not by editorial fiat.
Propose a concept →The Reliability Surface describes the behavioral properties and engineering controls a production agent needs. Reliability Debt appears when capability, complexity, or authority grows faster than those controls. Progressive Autonomy connects the two by requiring evidence before authority expands and by contracting authority when reliability deteriorates. Together, these concepts give teams a practical vocabulary for designing, evaluating, operating, and governing autonomous AI systems.